Что купить canon m200 или m50

Canon M200 vs Canon M50

The following is a comprehensive analysis of the Canon M200 vs Canon M50, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both of them are produced by Canon. The image resolution of the M200 (24MP) and the M50 (24MP) is pretty close and they possess the exact same sensor measurements (APS-C).

The M200 was introduced 20 months after the M50 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon M200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Canon M50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a simple summation of how the M200 grades against the M50 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Canon M200 vs Canon M50 Gallery

Below is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS M200 & Canon EOS M50. The whole galleries are available at Canon M200 Gallery & Canon M50 Gallery.

Reasons to pick Canon M200 over the Canon M50

M200	M50
Revealed	September 2019		February 2018	Newer by 20 months

Reasons to pick Canon M50 over the Canon M200

M50	M200
Screen type	Fully Articulated		Tilting	Fully Articulating screen

Common features in the Canon M200 and Canon M50

M200	M50
Manual focus		Dial precise focus
Screen dimension	3"		3"	Identical screen measurements
Screen resolution	1040k		1040k	The same screen resolution
Selfie screen		Both good for selfies
Touch friendly screen		Quickly navigate

Canon M200 vs Canon M50 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to travel with your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Canon M200 features exterior measurements of 108mm x 67mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") having a weight of 299 grams (0.66 lbs) whilst the Canon M50 has specifications of 116mm x 88mm x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Check out the Canon M200 vs Canon M50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the M200 and the M50.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M200 and M50 is 88 and 79 respectively.

Canon M200 vs Canon M50 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The picture here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M200 and M50.

Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of files but you have to consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent M200 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.

Canon M200 vs Canon M50 Screen and ViewFinder

Limited Edition Disney X100V Camera by Fujifilm

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Canon M200 vs Canon M50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon M200 and Canon M50

Canon EOS M200	Canon EOS M50
General Information
Make	Canon	Canon
Model	Canon EOS M200	Canon EOS M50
Class	Entry-Level Mirrorless	Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed	2019-09-25	2018-02-26
Physical type	Rangefinder-style mirrorless	SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip	DIGIC 8	Digic 8
Sensor type	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor size	APS-C	APS-C
Sensor dimensions	22.3 x 14.9mm	22.3 x 14.9mm
Sensor surface area	332.3mm²	332.3mm²
Sensor resolution	24MP	24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio	1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9	1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution	6000 x 4000	6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO	25600	25600
Highest enhanced ISO	—	51200
Lowest native ISO	100	100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points	143	143
Lens
Lens mounting type	Canon EF-M	Canon EF-M
Total lenses	23	23
Crop factor	1.6	1.6
Screen
Type of screen	Tilting	Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal	3 inches	3 inches
Resolution of screen	1,040 thousand dots	1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type	None	Electronic
Viewfinder resolution	—	2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage	—	100%
Features
Minimum shutter speed	30 seconds	30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed	1/4000 seconds	1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate	6.1 frames per sec	10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation	Yes	Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range	5.00 m (at ISO 100)	5.00 m (at ISO 100)
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions	3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC	3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, AAC
Highest video resolution	3840×2160	3840×2160
Video file format	MPEG-4, H.264	MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless	Built-In	Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB	SB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)	No
GPS	None	None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight	299g (0.66 lb)	390g (0.86 lb)
Dimensions	108 x 67 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4")	116 x 88 x 59mm (4.6" x 3.5" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score	not tested	not tested
DXO Color Depth score	not tested	not tested
DXO Dynamic range score	not tested	not tested
DXO Low light score	not tested	not tested
Other
Battery life	315 photos	235 photos
Battery type	Battery Pack	Built-in
Battery model	LP-E12	—
Self timer	Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)	Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type	SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)	SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots	1	1
Pricing at release	$549	$779

Epic Drone Videos Highlight Iceland's Magnificent Volcanic Outburst

More Comparisons

Panasonic FX75 vs Panasonic FZ100
Pentax K100D S vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
Panasonic S1H vs Panasonic FP5
Olympus SZ-11 vs Sony QX1
Sony RX10 III vs Sony HX80

Canon EOS M200 vs. M50: Which is Better?

When it comes to choosing a camera, there are many factors to consider. Do you want a DSLR or a mirrorless camera? What features are important to you? And how much money are you willing to spend? Canon’s EOS M200 and EOS M50 have a variety of features, which can be quite confusing. In this article, we compare the two cameras side-by-side to help make your decision easier.

What Is Canon EOS M200?

The 24.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor, DIGIC 8 image processor and 3″ 1.04m-dot touchscreen LCD work together to provide intuitive control over settings and accurate shot framing. The M200 also includes dual Pixel CMOS AF to ensure quick focusing, 4K video at 24 fps and up to 130 fps slow motion HD video recording capability, built-in Wi-Fi for easy sharing of photos and videos with compatible devices as well as Bluetooth connectivity for low power remote triggering of the shutter from afar. [1]

What Is Canon EOS M50?

This camera has a 24.1-megapixel APS-C sensor and can shoot up to 10 frames per second, making it perfect for anyone looking for a high-quality camera. The M50 also features the latest version of Dual Pixel Autofocus technology, allowing it to achieve fast and accurate focus on both stills and video footage. It also comes with an ergonomic design and intuitive user interface, making it one of the most user-friendly cameras available in its class.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Features

Sensor

The M200 is equipped with a 24.1MP APS-C CMOS sensor, and the M50’s sensor boasts 24.2MP.

Processor

Both cameras feature Canon’s DIGIC 8 image processor for rapid shooting and clear images that are rich in detail.

Autofocus

The M200 offers Dual Pixel AF with 143 AF points, making it more suitable for tracking moving subjects than the M50 which only has 49 AF points.

Continuous Shooting Speed

For capturing fast-moving action, the M200 is superior to the M50 as it can shoot at up to 6 fps compared to 4 fps on the latter camera.

Video Recording Capabilities

The M200 provides a range of video recording capabilities, such as 4K UHD resolution up to 30p and Full HD resolution up to 60p. The M50, on the other hand, can only record videos at Full HD resolution up to 60p.

Display

The M200 has an improved 3-inch vari-angle LCD screen with 1.04M dots compared to the M50’s 3-inch fixed touch screen with 1.04M dots. [2]

Viewfinder

The M200 is equipped with an EVF (electronic viewfinder) while the M50 does not have one. This makes it easier for users who prefer using an EVF rather than relying solely on the rear LCD display.

ISO range

The M200’s ISO range is from 100-25600 while the M50 has a slightly larger range of 100-51200.

Connectivity

The M200 offers Bluetooth for wireless image sharing, whereas the M50 does not have this feature.

Battery life

The M200 can shoot up to 315 shots on one charge, while the M50 is able to capture 305 shots per charge.

Metering zones

The M200 has 384 metering zones, whereas the M50 has fewer at 221.

Price

The Canon EOS M200 is more affordable than the M50, with a price tag of approximately $650 compared to $830 for the latter camera.

Memory card slot

The M200 has a single SD card slot, while the M50 comes with two.

LCD Monitor

The M200 has a 3.0″ 1.04m-dot tilting touchscreen LCD monitor, while the M50 comes with a 3.0″ 1.04m-dot fixed touchscreen LCD monitor.

Max burst

The M200 is also capable of shooting at up to 10 fps in its Continuous High+ mode, while the M50 can only capture images at up to 7.4 fps.

The M200 is slightly larger than the M50, measuring 4.3 x 2.6 x 1.7 inches compared to the latter’s 4.1 x 2.4 x 1.6 inches. [3]

Weight

The M200 is also slightly heavier than the M50, weighing 370g compared to the latter’s 351g.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Build And Handling

The most important aspect when comparing cameras is build and handling. Both the Canon EOS M200 and M50 feature lightweight, easy-to-hold body designs that make them ideal for carry around shooting. The M200 has a slightly larger grip than the M50, which makes it more comfortable to hold for extended periods of time. It also features a smoother button layout, with more easily identifiable buttons on top of the camera compared to the more clustered layout on the M50.

In terms of external controls, both cameras feature dedicated ISO adjustment dials as well as mode dials (with Scene Intelligent Auto being an exclusive feature on the M200). However, only the M200 features a dedicated exposure compensation dial and direct control of aperture and shutter speed. This makes it easier to adjust the settings on the fly and allows for more creative control over your images.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Lab Results

When it comes to performance, the M200 and M50 both feature 24.1MP APS-C sensors that produce excellent image quality, with good dynamic range and low noise levels in most lighting conditions. However, the M200 has a slight edge over the M50 when it comes to color accuracy, sharpness and contrast. The M200 also features a faster autofocus system (Dual Pixel CMOS AF) compared to the single contrast-detect system found on the M50. This autofocus system is much better at tracking moving subjects, such as people and animals.

This makes it the better choice for shooting slow-motion footage. The M200 also has more advanced features like Canon Log and HDR movie recording, which are not available on the M50.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Portability

When it comes to portability, the M200 and M50 are both quite similar in size and weight. The M200 is slightly larger than the M50 but still quite compact at 112 x 68 x 44mm (4.41 x 2.68 x 1.73in). Both cameras weigh approximately 408g (0.90 lbs.) with battery and memory card included. This makes them both easy to carry around without the need for a bulky camera bag.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Ergonomics & Comfort

Both cameras have ergonomic designs that make them comfortable to use for extended periods of time. The M200 has a slightly larger grip than the M50, which makes it more comfortable to hold and easier to access all the controls. It also features dedicated buttons on top of the camera as well as dials for adjusting ISO, shutter speed and aperture. On the other hand, the M50 lacks direct control over shutter speed and aperture but still offers an intuitive menu system with customizable function buttons.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Ease of Use

The Canon EOS M200 and M50 are both relatively easy to use cameras, even for beginners. They feature intuitive and straightforward menu systems, making it easy to access all the settings you need quickly. Both cameras also feature Scene Intelligent Auto modes that automatically select the optimal settings for each scene or subject. This makes them great choices for those who are just starting out in photography and want a camera that is easy to use without sacrificing image quality.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: Pros And Cons

When it comes to the Canon EOS M200, its chief advantage is its affordability compared to other mirrorless models in its class. It offers great features such as a fully articulated display, Wi-Fi connectivity, and dual pixel autofocus at an attractive price point. The downside of this model is that it doesn’t have 4K recording capabilities or many advanced features like some of its competitors do.

It features 4K recording capabilities and a high resolution electronic viewfinder, along with dual pixel autofocus and many other advanced features. However, the M50 lacks some of the convenience found in the M200 such as fully articulated display, Wi-Fi connectivity, and microphone port.

In terms of image quality, both Canon EOS models produce excellent results thanks to their 24MP APS-C sensors. The M200 produces slightly better images due to its Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology while the M50 can record 4K video at up to 30fps which is great for vlogging or filmmaking.

When comparing these two models side by side, it’s clear that the Canon EOS M200 is the better value for money. It offers great features and image quality at a much lower price point than its competitor. However, if you’re looking for 4K recording capabilities or advanced features, then the higher priced Canon EOS M50 is worth considering.

Ultimately, both of these models have their own advantages and disadvantages, so it comes down to personal preference when deciding which one to go with. If you’re on a tight budget but still want great features and image quality in a mirrorless camera, then the Canon EOS M200 is an excellent choice. On the other hand, if you can afford to splurge on something more advanced than the Canon EOS M50 should be your first choice. [4]

Alternatives to Canon EOS M200 and Canon EOS M50

When considering alternatives to these two mirrorless cameras from Canon, you’ll want to look at similar models from other brands like Sony’s Alpha series or Olympus’ Pen series. Each of these alternative camera lines offer different features and capabilities depending on the specific model you choose. Sony for example has its popular Alpha A6000 which offers a 24MP APS-C sensor, 11fps burst shooting, 4K video recording, and an OLED viewfinder. The Olympus Pen E-PL9 meanwhile offers 16MP Micro Four Thirds sensor, 8.6fps burst shooting, 4K video recording, and a touchscreen LCD. Both of these cameras provide some clear advantages over Canon’s M200 and M50 that may make them more suitable for certain kinds of photography or videography.

In addition to mirrorless camera alternatives from other brands, there are also DSLR options to consider. In this case you’ll want to look at models like the Canon Rebel T7i, Nikon D5600 or Sony A68. While these DSLRs can’t match the portability of a mirrorless camera, they often offer larger sensors and more advanced autofocus systems that appeal to certain kinds of photographers.

Canon EOS M200 vs. Canon EOS M50: How to Maintain?

When it comes to maintaining your Canon EOS M200 and M50 cameras, there are a few key things you’ll want to keep in mind. First and foremost, make sure to familiarize yourself with the user manual – both your camera’s body manual as well as its lens manual – so that you understand how each part of your equipment works. Additionally, make sure to take good care of the lenses by regularly cleaning them with an appropriate cleaning solution and a safe microfiber cloth.

For more general upkeep, ensure that all parts of the camera body are kept clean (this includes checking for dust build-up) and free from corrosion or damage. Make sure to power down your camera when not in use (especially if it’s been a long time since it was used) and store it in a safe place away from direct sunlight. Finally, if your camera has an LCD screen, make sure to use a cleaning cloth specifically designed for this purpose to avoid scratching or damaging the display.

These simple steps will go a long way towards keeping your cameras in good condition and helping them perform at their best when you’re ready to capture that perfect shot! So do yourself a favor and take some extra time to properly maintain your Canon EOS M200 and M50 cameras. It’ll be worth the effort! [5]

Is M50 good for professional photography?

However, it does not offer the same level of customization and advanced features found in higher end DSLRs or other mirrorless cameras such as the Canon EOS M200. The M50 is ideal for novice photographers looking to explore photography or hobbyists who want to upgrade from their smartphone camera but don’t have much budget to spend.

Is the Canon EOS M200 better than the M50?

The M200 comes with a 24MP sensor, Digic 8 processor, 4K video recording capabilities, improved autofocus performance compared to the M50, and extended battery life among other things. It is a better choice for those who need an upgrade from their basic smartphone camera or want to explore photography further but don’t have much budget to spend.

Can I use both cameras interchangeably?

Yes, both the Canon EOS M50 and the M200 are compatible with EF-M lens mount lenses so you can use either one with interchangeable lenses. However, the M200 has a larger APS-C sensor and will offer better image quality compared to the M50. Additionally, the M200 offers more features and customization options which may be beneficial for experienced photographers or those looking to further explore photography.

Is the Canon EOS M50 good for bird photography?

The Canon EOS M50 offers an electronic viewfinder, which is useful in capturing fast-moving subjects like birds. Additionally, the camera comes with Dual Pixel Autofocus which helps to track moving objects and will allow you to capture sharp images of birds in flight. The camera also offers 4K video recording capabilities so you can record videos of your favorite birds in action.

Is the Canon EOS M200 good for low light photography?

Yes, the Canon EOS M200 has a 24MP APS-C sensor and Digic 8 processor which allows it to perform well even in low light conditions. The camera also features an ISO range of 100-25600 that can be further expanded up to 51200 for capturing clearer images in low light. Additionally, the camera has an autofocus system with 99 selectable points which helps to keep focus on the subject even in dimly lit environments. Overall, the Canon EOS M200 is a better choice than the M50 for those who need advanced features and customization options or are looking to capture images even in low light conditions. However, for basic photography needs, the M50 is a good option too.

Is the Canon M200 good for 4K?

Yes, the Canon EOS M200 is capable of shooting 4K video at up to 30fps and can also be used for recording full HD videos at 60fps. It also offers an HDR movie mode which can help you create more vibrant videos with greater dynamic range. Additionally, it has a 3-inch touchscreen LCD that allows you to easily adjust settings while filming or review footage after the shoot. The camera comes with Dual Pixel Autofocus as well so that you can track moving objects in your frame and get sharper focus even when shooting 4K.

Is Canon M50 waterproof?

No, the Canon EOS M50 is not waterproof and cannot be used underwater. If you are interested in taking photos or videos while swimming or snorkeling, then you should look for a different camera that can withstand water as the M50 may get damaged if submerged.

Is M200 good for videography?

Yes, the Canon EOS M200 is great for videography and offers a range of features that make it suitable for videographers. It has 4K video recording at 30fps, full HD video recording up to 60fps, dual pixel autofocus for tracking moving subjects, an LCD touchscreen for easily adjusting settings or reviewing footage after shooting, and HDR movie mode for improved dynamic range. Additionally, the camera offers multiple image stabilization modes which can help you capture smoother videos even when shooting handheld.

Useful Video: Canon M200 vs M50 vs M6 Mark ii – Which one should you get?

Conclusion

Both the Canon EOS M200 and M50 cameras are excellent options for beginner photographers who are just starting out. The M200 offers a more advanced feature set, richer image quality, and faster performance. However, it is also more expensive and has a slightly larger size. On the other hand, the M50 is smaller, more affordable, and better suited for those on a budget or more casual photographers. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will come down to your individual needs and preferences as both cameras offer great features that can help you capture amazing photos. Ultimately you should do research on both cameras before deciding which one is best for you to ensure that you get the best value for your money.

No matter which camera you choose, you’re sure to be satisfied with its excellent performance. The Canon EOS M200 and M50 are both great options for beginner photographers that will help you capture beautiful photos. With their advanced features, excellent image quality, and affordable prices, these cameras give you the versatility and convenience necessary to take your photography to a whole new level. So no matter which one you decide on, you can rest assured knowing that you have made an informed decision!

Canon M200 vs M50

The Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 are two digital cameras that were officially introduced, respectively, in September 2019 and February 2018. Both the M200 and the M50 are mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras that are equipped with an APS-C sensor. Both cameras offer a resolution of 24 megapixels.

Below is an overview of the main specs of the two cameras as a starting point for the comparison.

Going beyond this snapshot of core features and characteristics, what are the differences between the Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50? Which one should you buy? Read on to find out how these two cameras compare with respect to their body size, their imaging sensors, their shooting features, their input-output connections, and their reception by expert reviewers.

Body comparison

The side-by-side display below illustrates the physical size and weight of the Canon M200 and the Canon M50. The two cameras are presented according to their relative size. Three consecutive perspectives from the front, the top, and the back are available. All width, height and depth dimensions are rounded to the nearest millimeter.

Both cameras are available in two different colors (black, white).

If the front view area (width x height) of the cameras is taken as an aggregate measure of their size, the Canon M50 is notably larger (41 percent) than the Canon M200. Moreover, the M50 is markedly heavier (30 percent) than the M200. In this context, it is worth noting that neither the M200 nor the M50 are weather-sealed.

The above size and weight comparisons are to some extent incomplete since they do not consider the interchangeable lenses that both of these cameras require. Hence, you might want to study and compare the specifications of available lenses in order to get the full picture of the size and weight of the two camera systems.

The following table provides a synthesis of the main physical specifications of the two cameras and other similar ones. In case you want to display and compare another camera duo, you can use the CAM-parator app to select your camera combination among a large number of options.

Any camera decision will naturally be influenced heavily by the price. The retail prices at the time of the camera’s release place the model in the market relative to other models in the producer’s line-up and the competition. The M200 was launched at a markedly lower price (by 30 percent) than the M50, which puts it into a different market segment. Usually, retail prices stay at first close to the launch price, but after several months, discounts become available. Later in the product cycle and, in particular, when the replacement model is about to appear, further discounting and stock clearance sales often push the camera price considerably down. Then, after the new model is out, very good deals can frequently be found on the pre-owned market.

Sensor comparison

The size of the sensor inside a digital camera is one of the key determinants of image quality. All other things equal, a large sensor will have larger individual pixel-units that offer better low-light sensitivity, wider dynamic range, and richer color-depth than smaller pixels in a sensor of the same technological generation. Further, a large sensor camera will give the photographer additional creative options when using shallow depth-of-field to isolate a subject from its background. On the downside, larger sensors tend to be associated with larger, more expensive camera bodies and lenses.

Both cameras under consideration feature an APS-C sensor and have a format factor (sometimes also referred to as «crop factor») of 1.6. Within the spectrum of camera sensors, this places the review cameras among the medium-sized sensor cameras that aim to strike a balance between image quality and portability. Both cameras have a native aspect ratio (sensor width to sensor height) of 3:2.

The two cameras under review do not only share the same sensor size, but also offer an identical resolution of 24 megapixels. This similarity in sensor specs implies that both the M200 and the M50 have the same pixel density, as well as the same pixel size. It should, however, be noted that the M200 is a somewhat more recent model (by 1 year and 6 months) than the M50, and its sensor might have benefitted from technological advances during this time.

The Canon EOS M200 has a native sensitivity range from ISO 100 to ISO 25600. The corresponding ISO settings for the Canon EOS M50 are ISO 100 to ISO 25600, with the possibility to increase the ISO range to 100-51200.

Technology-wise, both cameras are equipped with CMOS (Complementary Metal–Oxide–Semiconductor) sensors. Both cameras use a Bayer filter for capturing RGB colors on a square grid of photosensors. This arrangement is found in most digital cameras.

Since 2007, DXO Mark has published sensor performance measurements that have been derived using a consistent methodology. This service is based on lab testing and assigns an overall score to each camera sensor, as well as ratings for dynamic range («DXO Landscape»), color depth («DXO Portrait»), and low-light sensitivity («DXO Sports»). The adjacent table reports on the physical sensor characteristics and the outcomes of the DXO sensor quality tests for a sample of comparator-cameras.

Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but also of capturing video footage. Both cameras under consideration have a sensor with sufficiently fast read-out times for moving pictures, but the M200 provides a higher frame rate than the M50. It can shoot video footage at 4k/25p, while the M50 is limited to 4K/24p.

Feature comparison

Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features. For example, the M50 has an electronic viewfinder (2360k dots), which can be very helpful when shooting in bright sunlight. In contrast, the M200 relies on live view and the rear LCD for framing. The adjacent table lists some of the other core features of the Canon M200 and Canon M50 along with similar information for a selection of comparators.

The Canon M50 has an intervalometer built-in. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software.

Concerning the storage of imaging data, both the M200 and the M50 write their files to SDXC cards. Both cameras can use UHS-I cards, which provide for Ultra High Speed data transfer of up to 104 MB/s.

Connectivity comparison

For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process. The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS M200 and Canon EOS M50 and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras (and selected comparators) provide for accessory control and data transfer.

It is notable that the M50 has a microphone port, which can help to improve the quality of audio recordings by attaching an external microphone. The M200 does not feature such a mic input.

The M200 is a recent model that features in the current product line-up of Canon. In contrast, the M50 has been discontinued (but can be found pre-owned on ebay). As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the M50 was succeeded by the Canon M50 Mark II. Further information on the features and operation of the M200 and M50 can be found, respectively, in the Canon M200 Manual (free pdf) or the online Canon M50 Manual.

Review summary

So how do things add up? Is there a clear favorite between the Canon M200 and the Canon M50? Which camera is better? Below is a summary of the relative strengths of each of the two contestants.

Advantages of the Canon EOS M200:

• Better video: Provides higher movie framerates (4k/25p versus 4K/24p).
• More compact: Is smaller (108x67mm vs 116x88mm) and thus needs less room in the bag.
• Less heavy: Is lighter (by 91g or 23 percent) and hence easier to carry around.
• Longer lasting: Can take more shots (315 versus 235) on a single battery charge.
• More affordable: Was introduced into a lower priced category (30 percent cheaper at launch).
• More modern: Is somewhat more recent (announced 1 year and 6 months after the M50).

Arguments in favor of the Canon EOS M50:

• Better sound: Can connect to an external microphone for higher quality sound recording.
• Easier framing: Has an electronic viewfinder for image composition and settings control.
• More flexible LCD: Has a swivel screen for odd-angle shots in portrait or landscape orientation.
• Faster burst: Shoots at higher frequency (10 vs 6.1 flaps/sec) to capture the decisive moment.
• Easier time-lapse photography: Has an intervalometer built-in for low frequency shooting.
• Better lighting: Features a hotshoe and can thus hold and trigger an external flash gun.
• More heavily discounted: Has been on the market for longer (launched in February 2018).

If the count of individual advantages (bullet points above) is taken as a guide, the M50 comes out slightly ahead of the M200 (7 : 6 points). However, the relative importance of the various individual camera aspects will vary according to personal preferences and needs, so that you might like to apply corresponding weights to the particular features before making a decision on a new camera. A professional wildlife photographer will view the differences between cameras in a way that diverges from the perspective of a family photog, and a person interested in architecture has distinct needs from a sports shooter. Hence, the decision which camera is best and worth buying is often a very personal one.

How about other alternatives? Do the specifications of the Canon M200 and the Canon M50 place the cameras among the top in their class? Find out in the latest Best Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera listing whether the two cameras rank among the cream of the crop.

In any case, while the comparison of the spec-sheets of cameras can offer a general idea of their imaging potential, it says little about, for example, the shooting experience and imaging performance of the M200 and the M50 in practical situations. At times, user reviews, such as those published at amazon, address these issues in a useful manner, but such feedback is on many occasions incomplete, inconsistent, and unreliable.

Expert reviews

This is why hands-on reviews by experts are important. The adjacent summary-table relays the overall verdicts of several of the most popular camera review sites (amateurphotographer [AP], cameralabs [CL], digitalcameraworld [DCW], dpreview [DPR], ephotozine [EPZ], photographyblog [PB]). As can be seen, the professional reviewers agree in many cases on the quality of different cameras, but sometimes their assessments diverge, reinforcing the earlier point that a camera decision is often a very personal choice.

The above review scores should be interpreted with care, though. The ratings were established in reference to similarly priced cameras that were available in the market at the time of the review. Thus, a score needs to be put into the context of the launch date and the launch price of the camera, and comparing ratings of very distinct cameras or ones that are far apart in terms of their release date have little meaning. It should also be noted that some of the review sites have over time altered the way they render their verdicts.

Other camera comparisons

Did this review help to inform your camera decision process? In case you are interested in seeing how other cameras pair up, just make a corresponding selection in the search boxes below. Alternatively, you can follow any of the listed hyperlinks for comparisons that others found interesting.

Specifications: Canon M200 vs Canon M50

Below is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the two cameras to facilitate a quick review of their differences and common features.

Camera Specifications

Camera Model	Canon M200	Canon M50
Camera Type	Mirrorless system camera	Mirrorless system camera
Camera Lens	Canon EF-M mount lenses	Canon EF-M mount lenses
Launch Date	September 2019	February 2018
Launch Price	USD 549	USD 779
Sensor Specs	Canon M200	Canon M50
Sensor Technology	CMOS	CMOS
Sensor Format	APS-C Sensor	APS-C Sensor
Sensor Size	22.3 x 14.9 mm	22.3 x 14.9 mm
Sensor Area	332.27 mm 2	332.27 mm 2
Sensor Diagonal	26.8 mm	26.8 mm
Crop Factor	1.6x	1.6x
Sensor Resolution	24 Megapixels	24 Megapixels
Image Resolution	6000 x 4000 pixels	6000 x 4000 pixels
Pixel Pitch	3.72 μm	3.72 μm
Pixel Density	7.22 MP/cm 2	7.22 MP/cm 2
Moiré control	Anti-Alias filter	Anti-Alias filter
Movie Capability	4k/25p Video	4K/24p Video
ISO Setting	100 — 25,600 ISO	100 — 25,600 ISO
ISO Boost	no Enhancement	100 — 51,200 ISO
Image Processor	DIGIC 8	DIGIC 8
Screen Specs	Canon M200	Canon M50
Viewfinder Type	no viewfinder	Electronic viewfinder
Viewfinder Field of View	100%
Viewfinder Resolution	2360k dots
LCD Framing	Live View	Live View
Rear LCD Size	3.0inch	3.0inch
LCD Resolution	1040k dots	1040k dots
LCD Attachment	Tilting screen	Swivel screen
Touch Input	Touchscreen	Touchscreen
Shooting Specs	Canon M200	Canon M50
Focus System	On-Sensor Phase-detect	On-Sensor Phase-detect
Manual Focusing Aid	Focus Peaking	Focus Peaking
Max Shutter Speed (mechanical)	1/4000s	1/4000s
Continuous Shooting	6.1 shutter flaps/s	10 shutter flaps/s
Shutter Life Expectancy	100 000 actuations	100 000 actuations
Time-Lapse Photography	no Intervalometer	Intervalometer built-in
Fill Flash	Built-in Flash	Built-in Flash
Storage Medium	SDXC cards	SDXC cards
Single or Dual Card Slots	Single card slot	Single card slot
UHS card support	UHS-I	UHS-I
Connectivity Specs	Canon M200	Canon M50
External Flash	no Hotshoe	Hotshoe
USB Connector	USB 2.0	USB 2.0
HDMI Port	micro HDMI	micro HDMI
Microphone Port	no MIC socket	External MIC port
Wifi Support	Wifi built-in	Wifi built-in
Bluetooth Support	Bluetooth built-in	Bluetooth built-in
Body Specs	Canon M200	Canon M50
Battery Type	LP-E12	LP-E12
Battery Life (CIPA)	315 shots per charge	235 shots per charge
Body Dimensions	108 x 67 x 35 mm (4.3 x 2.6 x 1.4 in)	116 x 88 x 59 mm (4.6 x 3.5 x 2.3 in)
Camera Weight	299 g (10.5 oz)	390 g (13.8 oz)

Did you notice an error on this page? If so, please get in touch, so that we can correct the information.

Canon EOS M200 vs EOS M50 Comparison

If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything). Prices last updated on .

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything). Prices last updated on .

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything). Prices last updated on .

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

If you buy a product through one of our referral links we will earn a commission (without costing you anything). Prices last updated on .

As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Product prices and availability are accurate as of the date/time indicated and are subject to change. Any price and availability information displayed on Amazon at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.

The Canon EOS M200 and the Canon EOS M50 are both mirrorless cameras with a close overall score. Released in 2019 and 2018 respectively, they share similar features.

Both cameras perform well, but the EOS M200 stands out due to its compact size, measuring 108 x 67 x 35mm and weighing only 229g (0.50lbs). This makes it more portable and convenient for users.

The EOS M50 is slightly larger and heavier, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 390g (0.86lbs). This might be better for those who prefer a more substantial grip on their camera.

Taking these factors into account, the Canon EOS M200 is a better choice for users seeking affordability and portability, while the Canon EOS M50 may suit those who prefer a larger and more robust feel.

Canon M200 vs M50 Overview and Optics

The Canon EOS M200 wins the optics comparison with a score of 62/100, a few points ahead of the Canon EOS M50. Both cameras share several specifications, including 24 megapixels, a CMOS sensor, Digic 8 processor, an APS-C sensor size, a Canon EF-M lens mount, and no image stabilization.

The Canon EOS M50 outperforms the M200 in terms of shooting speed, offering a faster rate of 10 frames per second compared to the M200’s 6.1. This advantage allows the M50 to capture fast-moving subjects and action scenes more effectively. The M50’s slightly higher optics score reflects this improved performance.

Canon M200 vs M50 Video Performance

The Canon EOS M50 outperforms the Canon EOS M200 in video capabilities with a score of 91/100 compared to the M200’s 83/100. Both cameras share some common specifications, such as a maximum video resolution of 4K and video dimensions of 3840 x 2160. Both cameras have time-lapse functionality built in.

The Canon EOS M50 takes the lead with its higher maximum video frame rate of 120fps, which is double the M200’s 60fps. This allows the M50 to capture smoother slow-motion footage and provides more flexibility in post-production. The faster frame rate makes the M50 a superior choice for those who prioritize video performance and need the ability to record high-quality, slow-motion footage.

While the Canon EOS M200 falls short in terms of video frame rate, it still offers solid video capabilities. Its 4K resolution and time-lapse functionality make it a suitable choice for casual video shooters who do not require the advanced slow-motion features of the M50. The M200 remains a viable option for those who value a balance between video performance and affordability.

Comparing the video capabilities of the Canon EOS M50 and the Canon EOS M200, the M50 is the clear winner due to its higher video frame rate. This advantage makes it the better choice for users who need advanced video features, such as slow-motion recording. The M200 still offers a decent video performance for casual users who do not require the additional capabilities provided by the M50.